Russian Orthodox Eschatology

The end-times framework within Russian Orthodoxy centered on Moscow as the Third Rome - the last defender of true Christianity. This shapes Russian foreign policy and provides theological justification for territorial expansion.

Key Elements

  • Moscow as Third Rome - After Rome and Constantinople fell, Moscow inherited the role of Christian civilization’s guardian
  • The Anti-Christ - In Orthodox framing, the coming secular/technological global government (which Jiang maps to Pax Judaica)
  • Defender of the faithful - Russia’s mission to protect Orthodox Christians worldwide
  • Katechon - The “restrainer” that holds back the Anti-Christ. Russia sees itself in this role.

How It Drives Policy

  • Ukraine - Kyiv is the birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy. Losing it is losing civilizational heritage, not just territory
  • NATO expansion - Not a security threat but the advance of secular/Anti-Christ forces against Orthodox civilization
  • Syria - Protecting Orthodox Christians in the Middle East
  • Self-isolation - Decoupling from the West is purification, not punishment

Putin frames the conflict in explicitly civilizational terms. The war isn’t about borders - it’s about the survival of Orthodox civilization against Western decadence.

Convergence

Russian Orthodox eschatology converges with other traditions in the War of Gog and Magog:

The convergence creates two eschatological blocs:

  1. Jerusalem-centered: Israel, Christian Zionist US, Jewish eschatological movements
  2. Anti-Jerusalem: Russia (Third Rome), Iran (Shia eschatology), broader Muslim world

Dugin’s Framework

Aleksandr Dugin provides the intellectual architecture:

  • Russia must restructure as a total war economy
  • The liberal international order is the Anti-Christ’s system
  • Russia’s suffering (sanctions, isolation, war) is purification
  • The endpoint is a new Orthodox civilization-state