David Ben-Gurion
Core idea: David Ben-Gurion was not merely Israel’s founding prime minister but the architect and chief executor of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine — a man who maintained a private commitment to “transfer” (expulsion) of the Arab population for decades while publicly accepting partition and coexistence, using the 1948 war as cover to implement what he had planned since the 1930s.
The Public vs. Private Ben-Gurion
Born David Gruen in 1886 in Plonsk, Poland, Ben-Gurion came to Palestine in 1906 and led the Zionist movement from the mid-1920s until the 1960s. He led the Mapai Party and functioned as both de facto Prime Minister and Defense Minister of the Zionist movement before becoming Israel’s first Prime Minister. His public persona — the democratic statesman reluctantly forced into war — bore no resemblance to his private writings. In public, he accepted the un-resolution-181 partition plan and warned of a “second Holocaust.” In private, his diary reveals a leader who was confident of military superiority, dismissed Arab capabilities, and treated the war as the long-awaited opportunity to implement mass expulsion.
His biographer Michael Bar-Zohar confirms: “In internal discussions, the ‘Old Man’ demonstrated a clear stand: it was better that the smallest possible number of Arabs remain within the area of the state.”
He envisioned the Jewish state extending far beyond Palestine — into Lebanon, Syria, and even the Sinai. On May 24, 1948, his diary recorded: “We will establish a Christian state in Lebanon… We will break Transjordan, bomb Amman and destroy its army, and then Syria falls.” Even he acknowledged the Palestinian perspective: “If I was an Arab leader, I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural. We have taken their country.”
The Transfer Obsession
Ben-Gurion’s commitment to removing Arabs from Palestine was documented across decades of private correspondence. As the leading Zionist historian Benny Morris acknowledged: “Transfer was inevitable and inbuilt into Zionism.”
- 1937, writing to his son: “The Arabs will have to go, but one needs an opportune moment for making it happen, such as a war.”
- 1937, on the Peel Commission partition plan: “This is not the lesser of evils but a political conquest and a historical opportunity… the most powerful lever for the gradual conquest of all of Palestine.”
- 1937, to the Zionist Executive: “After the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine.”
- 1937, on compulsory transfer: “The compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the Valleys of the proposed Jewish State could give us something we never had… I support compulsory transfer. I don’t see anything immoral in it.”
- 1938, to the Jewish Agency Executive: “I am for compulsory transfer; I do not see anything immoral in it.”
- 1940, Yossef Weitz recording Ben-Gurion’s circle: “It is our right to transfer the Arabs” and “The Arabs should go!”
- 1944, on transfer: “The transfer of Arabs is easier than the transfer of any other people. There are Arab states around, and it is clear that if the Palestinian Arabs are transferred, this would improve their situation and not the opposite.”
- November 2, 1947, to the Jewish Agency Executive: “There are 40% non-Jews in the areas allocated to the Jewish state. This composition is not a solid basis for a Jewish state… Only a state with at least 80% Jews is a viable and stable state.”
- December 3, 1947, in a speech to his Mapai party: He used the term “our national future” as code for the demographic balance, spelling out that ethnic cleansing was the alternative means of ensuring an exclusively Jewish state.
- December 1947, writing to Sharett: “We can starve the Arabs of Haifa and Jaffa if we wish to do so.”
The opportune moment he had identified in 1937 arrived in 1948.
Commander of the Consultancy
By 1946, Ben-Gurion had assumed total control over all security and defense issues. He assembled the-consultancy — a secret inner circle of eleven men who met at the Red House in Tel-Aviv. It was only among this group that he discussed openly the implications of his decision to disregard the partition map and use force to ensure Jewish majority and exclusivity.
When the Palestinian response to the partition vote proved disappointingly peaceful, Ben-Gurion approved the shift from “retaliation” to “initiative” (yozma in Hebrew). At the Long Seminar of December 31, 1947 – January 2, 1948, he explicitly recommended dropping the pretense: “This is not what we are doing. This is an offensive and we need to initiate preemptive strikes. No need for a village to attack us first.” Impressed by the destruction of the village of Sa’sa, he declared: “A destroyed house — nothing. Destroy a neighborhood and you begin to make an impression.” He told the Jewish Agency Executive: “They can either be mass arrested or expelled. It is better to expel them.” He endorsed the principle that every military action should end with “occupation, destruction, and expulsion.” On March 10, 1948, he and the Consultancy finalized plan-dalet, the master blueprint for systematic ethnic cleansing.
During the operations, Ben-Gurion personally tracked the cleansing with the obsessive precision of a bureaucrat. His diary meticulously recorded the names of occupied villages, the sizes of their lands, the number of people expelled. On February 7, 1948, he visited the emptied village of Lifta and reported jubilantly: “When I come now to Jerusalem, I feel I am in a Jewish city… through Lifta and Romema — there are no Arabs. One hundred percent Jews.”
The Duality of Rhetoric and Action
While privately celebrating the ethnic cleansing, Ben-Gurion publicly portrayed doomsday scenarios. He told audiences: “This is a war aimed at destroying and eliminating the Jewish community,” never acknowledging the passivity of Palestinians or the provocative nature of Zionist operations. He compared Palestinians to Nazis and framed every military operation as self-defense. This discrepancy between public terror and private confidence was deliberate — it ensured Jewish soldiers would not hesitate when ordered to cleanse, kill, and destroy.
He did not publicly celebrate when the British Mandate ended on May 15, 1948, aware of the enormous task still ahead: completing the ethnic cleansing while repelling token Arab military interventions.
Key Insight
Ben-Gurion’s diary is the most damning primary source for the Nakba — it documents, in his own handwriting, that the expulsion of Palestinians was a goal he pursued for decades, proving that the “war of independence” narrative is a retroactive cover story for a premeditated ethnic cleansing he personally commanded.
Related
- the-consultancy - The secret body he assembled and directed
- plan-dalet - The master plan he finalized
- nakba-1948 - The ethnic cleansing he executed
- village-files - The intelligence apparatus he oversaw
- fortress-israel - The demographic obsession he institutionalized
- theodor-herzl - His ideological predecessor who built the institutional framework
- jordan-zionist-collusion - The secret deal with Abdullah he negotiated
- zionist-paramilitary-organizations - The military forces he unified under a single command
- israel-actor - The state he founded through ethnic cleansing
- balfour-declaration - The British promise he leveraged and exceeded
- ethnic-cleansing-palestine-moc